The O.J. Simpson Trial Essays -- Simpson Trial Murder Case Essays

The O.J. Simpson Trial On June 12,1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were murdered. Their bodies were discovered outside Nicole Simpsons condominium. Nicole Simpson was the estranged wife of the famous football game player and T.V. star O.J. Simpson. The people directly involved with this case be Judge Lance Ito, the pursuance lawyers, Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden, the defense lawyers, Johnnie Cochran, Robert Shapiro and Robert Blasier , the jury and the defendant, O.J. Simpson. The families of the victims restrain besides been present in the courtroom, as well as other spectators and intelligence service media. This case has heard one hundred and twenty witnesses over a nine month period.The prose trim downions physical evidence includes a damn glove, bloody socks, hair, and fibres and a trail of blood drops connecting the crime scene and O.J.s estate. Defence lawyers enounce this physical evidence means nonhing because it was either purposely tainted or contaminated. Kenneth Berris testified that two lavation bags are still missing from Simpsons cabbage hotel room. The bloody clothes and murder implement have never been fix.The prosecution says DNA tests place Simpsons genetic markers on the drops of blood leading forward from the bodies. There were also blood samples, similar to Simpsons and the victims, found on O.J.s broncho truck. Simpsons blood was also found on his driveway and his foyer. The prosecution says Simpson cut his hand during the murder. The defence says Simpson cut his hand when he reached for his phone in his Bronco and later cut his hand on a glass. The main focus of the defence is the contamination of physical evidence. Roger Martz testified, for the prosecution, that the blood he time-tested contained no significant amounts of EDTA. He said the blood found at the crime scene didnt come from a test tube with limited preservatives used at a crime lab. Defence lawyer Robert Blazier filed written document stating that Roger Martz has a habit and custom of changing F.B.I. reports, removing helpful defense learning and has falsely testified in a number of cases. Microbiologist, John Gerdes, testified that he found sloppiness so serious at the LAPD lab that it could have allowed overseas DNA to be introduced into evidence samples. He showed pictures of the lab where test tubes were affecting each other which could cause the contamination. Gerdes also... ...s claimed I did not, could not and would not have committed this crime. My impression about this case is that O.J. Simpson is guilty. The defence tries to say in that location was all this conspiracy to frame O.J. but I dont think they turn out any of this happened. The defence said Furhman was a racist but this does not prove that Simpson didnt commit the crime. They say the blood samples were contaminated but I dont think every single one was. The prosecution proved he was an abuser and I think something finally snapped ins ide him and he killed Nicole and Goldman. The gloves the cause of death wore were the same type O.J. wears. When they say O.J. tried on the gloves and they didnt fit I think he tightened his hand up so the gloves would be large(p) to put on. The shoeprints at the crime scene were the same style and sizing he wears. Bloody clothes or a murder weapon have never been found but neither has the missing laundry bags from O.J.s hotel room. I have to wonder why O.J. lead the police on a big chase if he is so darn innocent. My opinion is that O.J. Simpson would have been found guilty a long time agone if it wasnt for all the publicity surrounding the case and the fact that hes famous.