The Real World of Technology

This essay is in context to Ursula Franklins Real humanity of applied science. Urusla Franklin is an Author, research Physicist, Metallurgist and Educator. She was born on 16th September, 1921 in Munich, Germany. She is cognize for this reading, The Real World of Technology, which is based on her 1989 Massey Lectures, and The Ursula Franklin Reader Pacifism as a Map, a collection of her papers, interviews, and talks. In this reading, the Author, Franklin has named the title The Real World of Technology because she wants to speak out or tell the real rectitude about engine room.She wants spread awareness to the world regarding the ill personal effects of engineering on humanity. If left-unchecked engineering leave alone eventually destroy society as we know it. She differentiates the use of technology in the past, what it is at present and what it will be in the future. Franklin illustrates her point by focusing on the effects technology has had on society and cultures in the pa st. She uses examples from China before the harsh Era to the Roman Empire, with a majority of examples coming form the domiciliate one hundred and fifty years. Such as the Industrial rotary motion and the invention of electronic mail.Franklin contends that for society s sake, deal must distrust everything before accepting new technologies into their world. In the book, Franklin s argument urges people to come together and participate in domain reviews and discuss or question technological practices that lead to a world that is designed for technology and not for society. The Real World Of Technology judges to show how society is affected by every new invention that comes onto the market and supposedly makes bearing more easy going and hassle free while fashioning work more productive and profitable.The lectures argue that technology has strengthened the firm in which we live and that this house is continually changing and being renovated. in that respect is very littl e human activity outside of the house, and all in habitants are affected by the design of the house, by the division of its space, by the location of its doors and walls. Franklin claims that rarely does society step outside of the house to live, when compared with generations past.The intention for leaving the house is not to enter the natural environment, because in Franklin s terms environment essentially means what is around us that constructed, manufactured, built environment that is the day-in-day-out setting of much of the contemporary world of technology. Nature immediately is seen as a construct instead of as a run or entity with its own dynamics. The book claims that society vies nature the same right smart as society views infrastructure as something that is there to accommodate us, to palliate or be part of our lives, subject to our planning.Franklin writes in-depth about infrastructure and curiously technological infrastructure. She claims that since the Industri al Revolution, corporations as well as authoritiess using public funds have invested heavily into technological infrastructures and that the growth and development of technology has required as a necessary prerequisite a support relationship from governments and public institutions that did not exist in earlier times.Franklin feels that the original environmental crisis that is facing the worldpolluted air and water, acid rainfall and global warming to name a few, are due to the infrastructures built to support technology and its divisible benefits. Because of the newfound relationship between government and the cloistered sector and the fact that these infrastructures cant be built without the governments of the world, the state is just as much to blame for the current mark of the environment as any polluting cooperation.The difference between a private company and the government, Franklin insists, is that citizens surrendered some of their individual autonomy (and some of the ir money) to the state for the shelter and advancement of the the common good that is indivisible benefits. When governments do not attempt to stop the destruction caused by the creation of these infrastructures, the government is doing a disservice to its citizens. Just as the Industrial Revolution led to productive and holistic divisions of labor, she fears that new technologies non-communication technologies